S M Chen
1 min readNov 26, 2021

--

Thank you for reading, and for your comments.

I am not a psychiatrist, although I am a physician in the USA. I cannot speak about how medicine is practiced in Australia.

Here are a couple links to ECT as it is currently administered in the USA, from the Mayo Clinic:

https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/electroconvulsive-therapy/about/pac-20393894

and the cosent form for ECT from Johns Hopkins University:

https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/psychiatry/specialty_areas/brain_stimulation/docs/ECT%20consent_Feb2017.pdf

When I was a diagnostic radiologist (fairly recently, in 2019) in a tertiary care over 400 bed hospital in a sizable metropolitan area of the USA, we would, on occasion, evaluate spine x-rays ordered on patients who were about to undergo ECT. If fractures were that rare consequent to ECT, why would a psychiatrist want to see pre-procedure x-rays of bones that were most prone to fracture?

While fractures may be rare, they are mentioned in the consent form, the link to which I provided.

Personally, I would have ECT for depression as a last resort.

I disagree with your final statement: "Not enough facts."

You are entitled to your opinion, of course, just as I am entitled to mine.

--

--

Responses (1)